CAA Consultation - Review of UK UAS Regulations

I’ve just spent the last 90 minutes reading consultation paper from front to back.

This whole thing will be implemented, no matter what anyone as to say.

To be completely honest, if as a drone pilot, I stick to the rules then I have nothing to worry about, which is the same as any other laws and or legislation.

When I was a young lad (some 35-ish years ago) I was taught some very simple life rules, one of which was -
“If you want to take a chance at running the gauntlet, be prepared to get chased”

In simple terms, break the rules = face the penalty.

Everything we do is tracked or recorded by CCTV, our phones, tablets, reward cards, vehicle satnavs, smart speakers, etc… etc… and that’s what we know about, never mind what we don’t know about.

I know my post with ruffle a few feathers, but that’s life.

3 Likes

As I always say, play stupid games and win stupid prizes.

1 Like

… having a really excellent meal.

#IWin

CAA

C+++s And A++++++s

I’m actually at the point of throwing it all in , I love the hobby but this is more complicated than holding a firearms and shotgun certificate

3 Likes

Further information about the source, and perhaps more importantly, the narrative of this number:


It’s come from the NPCC Counter Drone team.

Which probably says it all really :roll_eyes:

Another FOI from Ian "UAVHive" Hudson went in yesterday:

Really happy that I have my old fashioned parrot bebop now cause I won’t have the app moaning at me about remote ID.

1 Like

To be honest I have lost the will to live. There are all kinds of dangerous things going on and non of them have anything to do with drones.
I had said before I used to fly hang gliders and didn’t have to deal with all this toing and froing with stupid regulations. A few idiots have ruined it for all of us trying to be clever and they know who they are. These changes will just cause anarchy. Stop people flying over police stations etc and let the rest of us fly around not causing any problems.

2 Likes

Completely agree. None of this has anything to do with pilots causing this new rule it’s just purely the public that don’t understand drone regulations and that if we are not close to them or on their property we are in our rights to fly how we want. Unfortunately the CAA clowns are probably never going to change this rule

1 Like

When you think about it, what exactly does the CAA do FOR us for our £12 a year, other than impose ever more strict restrictions on us.

To me they appear to be little more than a protection racket - “Give us your money, and if you step out of line we’ll send the boys round” :frowning:

3 Likes

One thing I fail to see is this security nonsense they keep mentioning. What security are they pertaining to ? We have laws to deal with security. One other thing, is there any safety difference between a sub 250gm drone with a camera and a sub 250gm drone that doesn’t have a camera ? I’d have thought it takes the same skill set to fly either, yet the CAA are wanting to relax the requirements to fly one without a camera ( or should that be increase the requirements to fly one with a camera ?)

1 Like

It is true. They make a fortune from all of us pilots combined together and yet all they do with it is tell us how to use our drones ( which would be ok if the rules where not absolute jokes). Much more concerned about the public complaints than the complaints of the pilots that pay them.

1 Like

Also how are we supposed to put this rubbish on fpv drones? More electronics to buy to make fpv builds more expensive?

1 Like

Have they ever published figures ?

I predict that much like automated moving traffic tickets, a central DB will be used to auto issue FPNs for any flights they deem to be outside ‘the rules’

And of course those systems never make mistakes do they …

Yep, just like that copper who clocked me at 53mph in a 50mph zone a few years back :joy::joy::joy:

No where in these proposed regs is there anything for the FPV flyer. They seem to have been overlooked :wink:

Interestingly, they also published a summary of the responses from the original call for input

You will see the most negative response was against Remote ID, so they obviously will not introduce that …. Oh wait……

1 Like

Not that I’ve seen, but we can do some quick maths ourselves.

A FOI from December 2022 showed 191,185 registered Operator IDs (anyone got a more recent number?)

191185 x £12 = £2,294,220 :pensive:

Imagine what service this site could provide to drone enthusiasts in the UK if you had £2M in revenue each year!!!

2 Likes