Cotswold villagers say drones are an invasion

Or an old cunt with a DJI in the Village as my Nan says now :laughing:
giphy
No mention of Bikes and Cars on a track day eh noisy fuckin things she would say :roll_eyes:

1 Like

Some of the comments are brilliant…

[Fooling no one], Berkshire, United Kingdom, 53 minutes ago

The people ive seen flying drones all look a bit dodgy, I can’t imagine the motive of them filming children, someone needs to check the boot of their cars for long cable ties and duct tape.

Just popping out to remove the duct tape and cable ties from the car…
:rofl:

3 Likes

that soon escalated, there was about a dozen comments when I first saw it

I’m sure that almost 99.9% of non drone fliers all believe drones are only ever used for two purposes. 1, to scout out the best houses to burgle, or 2, Take pics of kids. :roll_eyes::roll_eyes::roll_eyes::roll_eyes::roll_eyes:

The Daily Telegraph contacted me to get some rules and to try and throw a bit of balance on this one… Can’t say I was happy with the headline but at least the article gets a bit more balanced as you read through it…

1 Like

And a pdf for those (including me) who don’t subscribe :sweat_smile:
Drones.pdf (3.0 MB)

3 Likes

Was just about to ask if you was on commission :laughing:

Mate, I am not going to read this trash, the Headline and then that first picture… FFS

1 Like

https://x.com/iKiteFlyer/status/1948847033919373531

4 Likes

Yeah, I was pretty unimpressed with the headline to say the least, but he did promise me he wanted a balanced article with some positive points for drones… At least that crap headline gets all the gammons reading it and then learn that actually it’s perfectly legal to fly them…

3 Likes

Where did the ā€œmustn’t fly below 50mā€™ā€ for sub 250 (i know they didn’t say 250 but most drone in these settings will be) come into it, or, have they taken what you said out of context like alot of people with the rules. Thanks for the PDF.

Looks like the read the drone code without scrolling down to the sub-250g section…

I said to him that CAA guidance advised staying above 50 metres when flying over properties to avoid privacy issues. Which is true; I did read that on their site somewhere and it’s what I tend to try and stick to to avoid annoying people in their gardens… But they seemed to turn that into a hard rule…

Ahh like one of my near neighbours, who told me they didn’t want to see their roof on a video I took two years ago. :joy::joy::joy::joy:

1 Like

Ian, I see the article mentions New Zealand as a switched on country. Well from what Bruce ( X Jet) says about NZ drone rules , I’d have to disagree with the Telegraphs assessment of that country. In NZ you’re not allowed many of the freedoms we have in good old Blighty as far as drones are concerned. :wink::wink:

2 Likes

Thanks for sharing and also being a voice for the community :raising_hands: I actually like their green sign they’ve put up, anyone responsible will already know that and be comfortable with it but may deter those less responsible - end result being the residents reduce problematic behaviours but learn to live with drones being flown lawfully, as their pilots have a right to do so. Win win :trophy:

2 Likes

True! I think you can’t fly over any land unless youhave permission from the land owner…

:exploding_head:hahaha