Surely there would be issues using graduated filters on a drone. The idea of a graduated filter is to position the transition between the graduation and clear part of the filter at the horizon. On a camera, that is easy, but much more difficult to do on a drone, whilst still achieving the required composition. Just my thoughts.
I seem to recall that you’re around lakes, etc … but even then there are times when reflections improve the photo - clouds on a flat calm day, other reflections.
Indeed - those can be enhanced by rotating 90 degrees.
I’ve mainly used in the mountains - Dolomites/Alps - to help kill valley haze or deepen blue sky.
And the big problem with that is angle of the polariser depends on relative sun angle … so shit loads of thinking before the shot, and loads of bringing back and trying a little more rotated.
FAFF! = Filters Are Effing Faff!
… so it needs to be seriously needed before I bother with them.
Look at the shape and size of ND filters used in photography and the holder used too. The filters can be slid up and down in the holder which also rotates on the ring used to secure it to the lens. The amount of adjustment is far greater than could be achieved with a filter fixed to the front of a drone. ND filters are probably more useful for people like me, who have a drone with a fixed aperture, to control the amount of light hitting the sensor, rather than relying entirely on shutter speed and ISO.
Firstly, Freewell. Great products, no issues there. I’ve owned a few of their filters down the years. Speaking of filters…
I’ve stopped using them altogether on drones. The minute you take off, any set up you’ve done on the filter is redundant. I’ve so many pics from the past with a sky that’s deep blue on one side of the image and pale on the other. I’d rather shoot without now and adjust in the edit
Totally agree, I will occasionally use an ND for video on a very bright sunny day (not a lot of them in Scotland), but don’t use any filters for photographs, all done in editing.