Hi
Maybe a silly question but after spending a few hours looking at some good videos and articles explaining both very well, with the differences laid out, setting out the pros and cons for different categories of drones a thought occurred to me.
Wouldn’t it be easier just to get an association membership to get Article 16 benefits (as well as PLI) and do an A2 CofC course (to give me a head start on the drone learning curve) or am I missing something.
Thank you in advance 
1 Like
Nobody can answer this except you because it depends entirely on what you want to do with your drone, and what drone you have.
But … Good 2 Go will let you test out your likely scenarios against the two qualifications, and see which serves you best:
5 Likes
A16 requires that you fly manually - no autonomous modes such as active track or waypoint. Even pano mode is out.
Given that the UAVhub A2 course is only £49 via the GADC members only forum it is easy enough to have both A2 and A16A.
3 Likes
I have both. And since getting my A2 CofC, I’ve used it precisely once, and my Article 16 plenty of times. The 50m horizontal separation for the A2 CofC with a legacy/transitional drone makes it useless for most of my purposes, although I’m glad I did the learning. If there’s anyone on this group who is finding their A2 CofC regularly useful, I’d be interested to hear in which places and situations.
3 Likes
I was, and still am, a member of the BMFA long before this ridiculousnesses was contrived, so I’m covered by Article-16.
I feel this authorisation provides greater privileges than the A2COC if your intent is to fly for recreational purposes only. It permits the use of heavier craft, and more lenient requirements when it comes to distances from uninvolved persons, than the A2COC provides in similar situations.
If I felt the urge to fly for commercial gain I have a Mini2, and could apply for the suitable and required insurance cover.
3 Likes