Even the RAF can’t see power lines

https://x.com/veteranirish/status/1725620687199461551?s=46&t=z47ChgB11yFqY-R41CgHGQ

Chinnook Power line hit

2 Likes

all parties should take responsibility for their actions

Visual flight rules state:

(f) Except when necessary for take-off or landing, or except by permission from the competent authority, a VFR flight shall not be flown:

(1) over the congested areas of cities, towns or settlements or over an open-air assembly of persons at a height less than 300 m (1000 ft) above the highest obstacle within a radius of 600 m from the aircraft;

(2) elsewhere than as specified in (1), at a height less than 150 m (500 ft) above the ground or water, or 150 m (500 ft) above the highest obstacle within a radius of 150 m (500 ft) from the aircraft.

https://regulatorylibrary.caa.co.uk/923-2012/Content/Regs/01280_SERA5005_Visual_flight_rules.htm

there is a reason for those rules regardless of what is being flown and for whom. them’s is the rules

“there are old pilots and there are bold pilots … but there are no old and bold pilots”

1 Like

I’m pretty sure that military choppers are allowed down to ground level and fixed wing down to 250 ft AGL (especially in LFAs and TTAs)

An interesting post by ’ Two’s In ’ taken from PPRuNe…

https://www.pprune.org/military-aviation/634424-chinook-power-line-strike-wales-7.html

Some interesting discussion here, but you have to look at the whole picture to assess the risk:

  1. There will always be unmarked wires - period. So location systems relying on the position of marked wires will always have a vulnerability. Also when operating low level there shouldn’t be too much taking your interest inside the cockpit for any length of time, so the 6 P’s are critical for this (see point 4).
  2. Helicopters have these really cool things called Pitch Change Links or Rods just below the rotor head. If any wire makes it up the cabin roof to this area you are going to have a really bad day. It doesn’t matter how big or heavy the aircraft is, these are an accessible and deadly point of catastrophe. This is why you need cutters or some form of deflection away from this area.
  3. The type of wires in this accident (11KVa strung at about 30’ or less) cause the majority of wire strikes. The poles are often in the trees, the wires turn green soon after hanging and the distance between poles is irregular depending on the terrain/topography. If you regularly fly low level and don’t anticipate or mitigate this hazard, your risk score went up considerably.
  4. Before training low level, (when possible) it makes a great deal of sense to do a slow, medium height route recce to clear the hazards before getting your adrenaline fill at 120 Knots and 15 feet.
  5. Operationally, you may be on your own in terms of wire and hazard mapping if you are in an distant or unknown area, but on operations we have a higher risk level not necessarily acceptable when training.

Low level flying is an operating environment that demands complete preparation, full attention and situational awareness. Hazard mapping systems don’t change any of that and wire cutters will only save your life after you’ve got it terribly wrong in the first place. I’m fully supportive of both of these measures, but they are fully effective only when, as professional aviators, we have taken all the preventative planning and operating measures we can before descending low level.

but if they hit something that is their problem not that of the object that they hit, be that a cable or a uav