Feature request: ChatGPT for our forum!

Hi Team,

I couldn’t find a relevant thread about this question and didn’t know where else to post this. Please feel free to redirect my post to the relevant place if needed.

I have been following a thread (link mentioned in the example that I shared below) and was wondering if anybody has thought of integrating ChatGPT in the forum to provide a summary and possibly do a bit more, like finding details, etc. I asked the following to ChatGPT, and the initial response and follow-up were helpful in summarising the thread and finding specific messages that were relevant to my interest.

Me: Please summarise this thread: National Trust Policy Correspondence

ChatGPT: The thread you provided is a discussion on a policy regarding the use of drones by the National Trust, a conservation organization in the UK. The policy states that the National Trust prohibits the use of drones on or over their land without prior written consent. The thread includes correspondence between the National Trust and a member who questioned the policy, as well as comments from other members expressing their opinions and experiences with the policy. Some members expressed frustration with the policy, while others defended the National Trust’s right to regulate drone use on their land in order to protect wildlife and preserve the tranquility of their sites.

Me: Summarise the critical or important points discussed in this thread by other people.

ChatGPT: The critical or important points discussed in this thread by other people are:

  1. Some members expressed frustration with the National Trust’s policy, arguing that it is overly restrictive and hinders their ability to capture photographs or videos of National Trust sites.
  2. Others defended the National Trust’s right to regulate drone use on their land in order to protect wildlife, preserve the tranquility of their sites, and prevent interference with other visitors.
  3. Several members shared their experiences of obtaining written consent from the National Trust to use a drone on their land, with some reporting that the process was relatively easy, while others found it to be more challenging.
  4. Some members suggested that the National Trust could consider implementing a system for pre-approved drone pilots who have completed a training or certification program.
  5. Others expressed concerns about the potential dangers of drones, including the risk of collisions with wildlife, people, or buildings, and the potential for drones to cause disturbance to wildlife or interfere with other visitors’ enjoyment of the sites.

Me: Show me the messages that relate to point 3 from the summary above.

ChatGPT: Here are some messages from the thread that relate to point 3:

  • “I have used a drone on National Trust land before and found the process of obtaining permission relatively easy. I simply emailed the National Trust, explained what I wanted to do and why, and they responded with a set of conditions that I needed to follow.”
  • “I had a different experience when trying to get permission to fly my drone on National Trust land. I had to fill out a lengthy application form, provide evidence of my insurance, and wait several weeks for a response.”
  • “I’ve also had mixed experiences with getting permission to use a drone on National Trust land. In some cases, it was relatively straightforward, but in other cases, I found the process to be quite bureaucratic and time-consuming.”
  • “I’ve never tried to fly my drone on National Trust land, but it’s good to know that it’s possible to get permission if you follow the right procedures. I would definitely consider doing it in the future if I have a good reason to capture footage of a National Trust site.”

Me: Are there mentions of how to contact National Trust, and what is the success rate based on messages in this thread.

ChatGPT: Yes, there are several mentions of how to contact the National Trust and the success rate of obtaining permission to fly a drone on their land. Here are some messages that address those topics:

  • “To contact the National Trust about drone use, you can email them at [email address] or call them at [phone number].”
  • “I contacted the National Trust by email to request permission to fly my drone over one of their sites, and I received a response within a few days. They provided me with a set of guidelines to follow and gave me permission to fly my drone as long as I adhered to their rules.”
  • “I’ve had success in obtaining permission to use a drone on National Trust land by submitting a detailed request via email. I explained my reasons for wanting to fly my drone and provided evidence of my experience and qualifications as a drone pilot.”
  • “I’ve tried to get permission to use a drone on National Trust land several times, but I’ve had mixed success. Sometimes I’ve been able to get permission relatively easily, but other times I’ve had to jump through a lot of hoops to get approval.”

Me: Based on all the interactions people have had with National Trust, what is the success rate of getting an approval?

ChatGPT: It’s difficult to determine the exact success rate of getting approval to fly a drone on National Trust land based on the messages in this thread, as users have reported mixed experiences. Some users have reported that they were able to obtain permission relatively easily by following the correct procedures and guidelines, while others have reported encountering bureaucratic hurdles and delays in the approval process.

Overall, it seems that obtaining permission to fly a drone on National Trust land is possible, but it may require some effort and patience. Users who have had success in obtaining permission have typically submitted detailed requests, explained their reasons for wanting to fly a drone, and provided evidence of their experience and qualifications as a drone pilot. It’s also important to follow the National Trust’s rules and guidelines for drone use, which are designed to protect wildlife and preserve the tranquility of their sites.

I am intrigued by ChatGPT and how it can help this forum and I would be happy to discuss ways of integrating it and brainstorm on features if people are interested.

2 Likes

I just learnt that this company enables a chatbot based on ChatGPT, that can be trained based on the webpages of a website and answer questions specific to that website: https://sitegpt.ai

I am curious to see how many people believe this will be useful and probably share questions that you might want to ask this bot. I am sure this will help the admins make a decision.

Will you use this feature? If yes, please feel free to add in the comments the kinds of questions that you would want to ask (perhaps refer to a recent thread that you were following because it interests you)
  • Yes
  • No
  • Maybe

0 voters

That looks to me like a whole lot of regurgitation and restatement of what’s in the thread, without really providing any concrete benefits.

The fact that AI systems are still new and have been shown to make mistakes and introduce inaccuracies means that personally, I’d rather read the thread myself and draw my own conclusions.

Yrs,
Ned Ludd :grin:

1 Like

The caveat being… you can’t trust it.

I’ve seen similar reports of ChatGPT creating fake academic articles with very convincing titles, authors and abstracts.

Basically, it’s not always a summary of what has been said on a given topic, rather a summary of what it thinks has probably been said.

1 Like

Ignore it being AI it will sulk and go away with any luck…:rofl:

1 Like

“Just autocomplete on steroids” :rofl: :clap:

That is a valid point, but the thread that I referenced has close to 690+ posts. It does provide the ability to dive into specific posts, and I was thinking if the answers can be moderated to show links to the specific messages in the thread would have helped me on the context.

Pull up a Chair its only 100 minutes :person_shrugging:

I think it has its uses but when the majority of this forum is based on people’s experiences and opinions I’m not sure what it can add.

There is potential to build out some really cool features using it but ultimately this will incur costs for something that is nice to have rather than a “must-have”

For example - the business I work in provides a website platform for a specific niche.
We have integrated GPT to allow users to create news and blog content, should they wish to.

It’s not essential but the marketers that use our services have received it warmly as it’s there to make their life a little easier should they choose to use it.

I also use an AI-powered note taker on the many virtual meetings I host most days.
It’s early days and although the transcription is helpful, it can be hit and miss and in some instances, it creates more work than a simple notepad and pen.

Personally, I can see that some may see a benefit but part of the fun with a forum is to read the many varying opinions rather than just having a summary that a computer thinks may be of interest.

2 Likes

The clue is in its name. It’s a chatbot. It’s not an artificial intelligence. It doesn’t understand anything it reads, it just uses a huge statistical model to predict the most “human-like” text in response to any given thing. That’s why it inevitably makes things up (confabulates, in the terminology), and hence is unreliable. It’s undeniably impressive, but …

I think your use-case is perfectly reasonable (summarising large threads), but you can do that right now, without the forum owners risking building in errors to their own site. Moderating humans making shit up is bad enough without adding in a chatbot that has been built to do just that.

4 Likes

tenor

:rofl:

I’m a software engineer myself, and don’t think this is the right space for it. As as been said before it’s not always right, and we don’t want people taking what it says as the law. It’s great for writing long articles when you only use a few keywords and you review what it’s written, but for this forum real experience is much more valuable.

1 Like