Well said Ian.
Clearly the newspaper had its agenda and considering that were clearly out to have another pop at drone flyers, I believe your side came out pretty well, as shown by the support you got in the comments. Well done for making the case so well.
Actually, I think you have helped put more pressure on EH and NT as they are having to start to recognise that they don’t have the power to control the skies above the site.
It was interesting that the Times didn’t have a quote from the CAA. Probably because it would have supported your comments!