I’d like a better camera than the Mini 2, but not at twice the price of a Mini 2 - and especially when it looks like a frog in receipt of a good rogering

I’d like a better camera than the Mini 2, but not at twice the price of a Mini 2
Mini 2 with a f2.1 upgrade for £250… Simples!
Mini 3 price rumors
The only rumored pricing we have so far for the Mini 3 Pro also states the possibility of a standard Mini 3. These prices don’t include import fees, and with the probability of no “Standard” Mini 3, take these prices with a grain of salt. With that said, here are some anticipated prices:
Version | DJI Mini 3 (might not exist) | DJI Mini 3 Pro |
---|---|---|
Standard | $549 | $699 |
+ Fly More Combo | $799 | $949 |
+ DJI RC | $1,099 | $1,249 |
If there are two models of the Mini 3, this would be a pretty standard pricing layout, with only a $100 markup from the Mini 2 to the Mini 3. However, if there is only one product, the Mini 3 Pro, that would be a huge markup from the previous version and would put you just a couple of hundred dollars away from similar packages for the Air 2S. Maybe we could also be getting the Mini 3 Pro for the Mini 3 stated price, and if that’s the case, it would be a killer deal for the features expected on DJI’s newest sub-250gram drone!
Source: DroneDJ

Mini 2 with a f2.1 upgrade for £250… Simples!
Hmmm…weight ? Gimbal control ? Camera settings in flight ?
I think I’m somewhere in the top tier of drone nerds, but I can honestly say that this impending release by DJI has left me totally underwhelmed.
It’s another camera drone. It will do the sames things its predecessors have done, maybe better image quality, but on the whole absolutely nothing different.
Now if it had even the most basic of A.I. capabiluties, maybe have the ability to be configured to do something different than generic camera drone functions, then I will admit I may feel something tingly in my lower regions. Until then I’ll continue to entertain myself with my collection of singing potato’s.

with only a $100 markup from the Mini 2 to the Mini 3
But no RC included at all for that price?

But no RC included at all for that price?
I saw you mention that earlier. But I seriously doubt DJI would remove the controller from any drone - especially it’s ‘beginner friendly’ drone and the sucessor to it’s biggest seller worldwide.
A beginner drone for a grand?
Entirely possible though Chris, I was just going by Jaspers posts on Twitter.
I do love a good rumour thread

A beginner drone for a grand?
Hey, DJI are just following Autel’s lead

But I seriously doubt DJI would remove the controller from any drone - especially it’s ‘beginner friendly’ drone and the sucessor to it’s biggest seller worldwide.
It’s biggest sale will be new tech adopters I’d guess, already Mini 2 owners, would they need another controller?
I welcome the option (if it’s the case)
Perhaps you can fly it on the app alone
I think I like the fact it has no legs, almost encourages / forces you to hand launch, but like the old Spark and it’s gestures
I don’t buy more Makita batteries with every power tool. The original ones work fine.
I’d say it would be good if DJI didn’t have so many different RCs and had the same on for every drone … and batteries, too, for similar sized drones.
The only catch to that though, is no progression
OcuSync 4 will be here soon.
More new controllers needed
Firmware upgrades could take care of that … MultiOccuSync™

I’d be interested to see @ianinlondon wind test this drone too. To be able to get the drone’s AUW below the 250g mark while including the extra electrickery some sacrifices will have had to be made. You can only go so far by reducing the amount of plastic the shell is made from so weight saving will have to be made to other components. The next in line will be the motors and battery as these are probably the bulk of the weight. To decrease the weight of the battery while retaining flight time the C rating will be reduced. Having a reduced C rating will mean restricting the throttle to prevent over stressing the battery, therefore the motors will have less torque and therefore lighter. I think this is why the Autel Nano Plus struggled so much in a strong breeze in Ian’s recent video reviews.
I’m actually with @Nidge with this.
The extra “sensors and electronics” the extra “elastictrickery” the weight loss every where to allow for these extra components. The motors will have to be shaved down in size.
The aerodynamics of a house brick. (Looks to me that way) I think it will be about as good flying as the Nano+
I’m reserved.
I’m personally doubtful that the aerodynamics (drag coefficient) are much different for either version of this drone. It’s no PowerEgg, if anyone other than @Nidge remembers that.

Firmware upgrades could take care of that
It’s hardware though
There’s no reason they couldn’t design the related RC hardware to accept firmware updates, though. Or at least make the later model RCs backward compatible.