Just read on BBC News that during his East Coast tour, some locals had downed Banksy’s (the artist) drone with a fishing net. The people claiming this were saying it as if it deserved applause. Do you think they should be prosecuted for criminal damage?
I saw that… over the model village. Interesting story behind it too, with the diversionary tactics to get Banksy on site, un-noticed, whilst he swapped out one of the model village buildings.
But still, you don’t go pulling drones out of the air with a large fishing net.
Cheers - Rob
This is obvious to me… yes, prosecute.
And the vandal ?
What vandal? I didn’t see any vandal!
The dude with the paint, genius or vandal ?
Aaah… yes… that is the question… it is open to the interpretation of the viewer IMO.
Banksy… urban street artist… or someone committing criminal damage?
See what I mean
Go on then, I’ll take the bait
If I rocked up at my local corner shop and started spraying paint on their gable wall I’d be charged with criminal damage.
What is there to interpret?
Quiet day in the farming game ?
Ground’s too dry in a lot of places still
That’s because he was more than 500m away
Out of interest, has anyone see any video footage of the drone being captured by a fishing net? Got any links to share?
I was meaning the person with the net. The other point of view has been posted on the “Art Arrows” site.
I see the proof of the tagger chap, but none of the drone incident.
So you would consider Banksy a criminal rather than a celebrated artist?
Just trying to understand…
Celebrated vandal. #simple
He can graffiti my place anytime, imagine the increase in value
Still a vandal!
Your moral barometer out of kilter again Paul ?
Yes.
The person with the net that snagged the drone should be charged IMO… people might not like a drone flying over their property and regardless of whether it is being flown legally or not, people cannot take the law into their own hands like that without consequences.
Banksy… a vandal?
Definition…
vandal
/ˈvand(ə)l/
noun
a person who deliberately destroys or damages property belonging to others.
We all know that any wall with a Banksy on it is worth a small fortune so by the definition of “vandal”, that is someone who “destroys or damages property”, is not destroyed or damaged… it is improved… so I do not see how Banksy can be considered a vandal.
I can’t find anything about a drone being captured by a net
You’d imagine someone caught it on video